Cost-effective housing technology for rehabilitation of tsunami affected areas

In the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami, Practical Action has been working with partners in Sri Lanka to develop cheap but high-quality housing, that can be built quicker than conventional housing.

This housing construction is the result of a technology that has been developed by architect Laurie Baker, and has been tested and proven during the past 40 years in India. It was tested in Sri Lanka duirng 2004, and proved to be appropriate to the conditions in rural Sri Lanka. Practical Action trained a team of masons on the job, both on theoretical and practical aspects.

The process of training was further enhanced and improved to suit our conditions through jointly sharing and incorporating views from the organizations such as National Engineering Development & Research (NERD) Center and Center for Housing Planning & Building (CHPB).

Technology features

Brick wall with 'rat-trap bond'

  • Strength is equal to standard 9" (229mm) brick wall, but consumes 20% less bricks.
  • The air medium that is created by the bond helps maintaining a good thermal comfort inside the building.
  • As the construction is appealing to the eye from both internally & externally, plastering is not necessary.
  • 100 square feet (9.3 sq m) of this wall will cost only rs. 6454/- as against the traditional 9" wall that costs  rs. 8759/-.
  • The overall saving on cost of this wall compared to the traditional 9" wall is about 26%.

the "rat-trap" bond

The roofing technology - 'filler slab' methodology

  • slab-concrete roofing
    Consumes less concrete and steel due to the reduced weight of the slab by the introduction of a less-heavy, low-cost filler material such as rejected calicut tiles, clay pots, broken pieces of cement blocks and brick bats.
  • This has enhanced the thermal comfort inside the building due to heat resistant qualities of the filler materials.
  • An ideal mechanism for the congested low-income communities where land is scarce, but building a standard up-stair house is not a financially viable option.
  • The roof can serve many other purposes by provision of space for livelihood tasks such as drying of incense sticks, crackers, lay fish and fishing nets which needs space can be done on this roof.
  • It completely cuts off the use of timber for roofing, contributing to solve one of the major environmental issues - cutting trees.
  • Reduction on the use of concrete too saves cement & metal about 40%.
  • The soffit of this slab gives an attractive look and therefore, a ceiling is not needed.
  • If it is 4" (100mm) thick, 100 square feet (9.3 sq m) of this slab will cost only rs.13003/- as against the traditional slab that costs rs.16958/-.
  • The saving on cost of this slab compared to the traditional slab is about 23%.

Both these methods can be easily taught to a fairly-skilled mason through an on-the-job training.

A square foot of this construction costs rs.510/ (€4.35). A house with one bedroom, living room, kitchen & toilet with an extent of 350 square feet can be built with rs.175,000.00 (€1,450).

This technology has about 30% overall-saving on cost of a building of traditional 9" construction. The structure has proven its strength to go up to three floors with the support of brick columns.

Provision of upper floor space by using 'filler slab' addresses the issue of land-scarcity while not demanding much space on ground. A 500 square feet (46 sq m) house can be easily built on a 4 perch (100 sq m) plot. Hence, in these designs, we have maximized the use of the plots, leaving various possibilities for extension of the houses at a later stage.

In designing, we have thought of two basic categories of residents; one is for people who lived on the reservation lands along the coast on temporary sheds etc. whose families are generally extended and large and, who will prefer many small rooms. For such families we have come up with options of many small spaces rather than providing few larger spaces.

The other category is the people who lived on comparatively interior lands in permanent houses, who are used to live in spacious rooms and, therefore the options with larger but few living spaces were designed.

For the purpose of maintaining consistency with the national level housing program, the cost of the options provided for both these categories cover an area of about 350 square feet (32 sq m) with a uniformed cost of about rs.175,000.00 (€1,450) or 500 square feet (46 sq m) with a uniformed cost of about rs.255,000.00 (€2,100).

However, we strongly believe that these designs can be considered only as a guide and decision-making on the type of house needed by occupants should be a consultative process prior to construction.

no comments