PERMANENT SHELTER FOR HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICES DESIGN - PLANNING PROCESS
Practical Action maintains a people first approach to housing. We firmly believe that when the housing process starts with comprehensively identifying the needs of the p eople, then the technology for providing the infrastructure and services will fall into place. Practical Action is committed to the fact that a house is not merely a structure but a starting point for communities to regain a lost future. This brief describes this approach taken by Practical Action in post -tsunami reconstruction in Sri Lanka. However, it would also have wider application wherever homes and livelihoods have been damaged by disasters or where rebuilding or improvement projects are being under taken with the resident population that is vulnerable; in many slums or informal settlements, for example. Prior to designing permanent shelters for persons displaced by disasters it is imperative to engage the community in the planning process. It is also important that communities understand the context of the changes and future risks they will have to face as a result of the disaster. It is recommended that prior to entering into housing rebuilding; a general discussion takes place. This will help participation of the community and the housing rebuilding subsequent steps.
Figure 1: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia
Practical Action, The Schumacher Centre, Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire, CV23 9QZ, UK T +44 (0)1926 634400 | F +44 (0)1926 634401 | E firstname.lastname@example.org | W www.practicalaction.org ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Practical Action is a registered charity and company limited by guarantee. Company Reg. No. 871954, England | Reg. Charity No.247257 | VAT No. 880 9924 76 | Patron HRH The Prince of Wales, KG, KT, GCB
Figure 2: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia
Engaging the community Identity and list the most successful strategies used by communities living in disaster-prone areas. In consultation with the community, build on indigenous measures to develop strategies that have already been successful. The following mechanisms are recommended to integrate community participation in the planning process: Include both women and men from the community in the a ssessment, planning and implementing of housing programmes. Invite women and men who are leaders in the community to strategic planning meetings and discussion, to enable a better focus on ground realities, leading to more targeted strategies. Identify and plan out the most useful forms of communication that can highlight and address the needs and concerns of women and men and marginalised communities such as people with disabilities. Bring together the different village-level organizations working in the area and share the focus / mandate of these organizations. Make sure that community-level practitioners/CBOs secure the involvement of both women and men in the community in local organisations.
Source: Madhavi Malagoda Ariyabandu and Maithree Wickramasinghe (2003) Gender Dimensions in Disaster management: A Guide for South Asia, ITDG South Asia Publication
Participatory surveys, processes and analysis aim to create and recognise multiple perspectives and offset biases by creating a debate about change. Debate about change should generate new thinking and a readiness to take action.
1. Time should be allowed for survey design, testing and adjustment prior to large -scale efforts. 2. Flexible and informal techniques should prevent collection of superfluous detail. 3. Data analysis should be an integral part of fieldwork not somethin g done afterwards or by others. 4. Collective analysis of the findings from pilot surveys should result in changes to the approach.
Tools for participatory assessment
The following are some of the tried and tested tools of participatory assessment, these should be adjusted and new approaches invented based on local knowledge and preferences.
Review of existing information – what do we know already?
Existing written material can provide a rich overview of relevant issues. Media, reports and information gathered by others should be reviewed keeping in mind that often these materials will have been written for a different purpose at a different time. Nonetheless “secondary data sources” can promote thinking and raise many questions for further exploration.
Observation – watch and learn
Simply watching people, noting what they do and how they act in a variety of situations can be very instructive. For example, if you observe the dynamics at a gathering you will get clues as to who is a natural or appointed leader in the community and clues will be evident as to who is excluded either by their total absence or silence during discussions. It is important to select the most appropriate tools and methodologies depending on the location/ communities etc. It is recommended that a suitable combination of a few tools is selected and used to obtain community participation.
Semi-structured interviews – talking with a purpose
People like to talk - having a conversation is the most natural thing in the world. Careful planning and some flexibility can go a long way to guiding natural conversations to ensure you cover issues of interest. Listening carefully and following up on the issues which are of most concern will result in an awareness of people’s concerns, problems and priorities for the future. Unexpected or new topics which arise can offer a fruitful direction of enquiry to pursue. Such interviews can be carried out with individuals, in small groups, and with specific people who are felt to be key players because of t heir specialist knowledge or roles. Interviewers should stop at the end of each interview and note their findings and share these with others at the end of each day to promote learning and to revise the structure of future interviews.
Drama, role play, so ngs and visual art forms – tell us a story
Traditionally, performing arts can be used to express ideas and concerns which might otherwise remain buried. Sensitive issues can be tackled in a non-personal way. Performers can structure their story in a way that raises questions or encourages the audience to determine the story line. For example, role plays talking about the lives of a fictitious Mr & Mrs Perera and their children has been used to promote discussion about HIV/AIDS in a way that saves any embarrassment, raises problems and suggests advice they might be given to overcome the challenges they face.
Diagrams and visual tools – can you picture this?
Diagrams and symbolic representation can usefully represent the current situation and risks faced at many levels. Laying symbols and diagrams out and noting how people relate various risks and measures to counter them can be informative in understanding existing coping mechanisms. The products may be interesting but it is often the conversations that people have during these processes that provide the richest materials for learning. Comparing and talking
Figure 3: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia
about the differences between diagrams produced by different groups of people can also be instructive. For example by asking women and men, or young and o ld people, or able bodied and people with disabilities to work separately a rich and diverse picture will emerge.
Mapping – it looks like this
Collectively producing a map of an area can identify specific hazards and features which vulnerable people can use to mobilise in times of need to minimise the risks to life and property. Mapping can also be used as a tool to plan how neighbourhoods should be developed. Many materials can be used to Figure 4: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia create maps, from sticks and stones to computer based software. If you need to keep a record then the process should be paper based or be transcribed onto paper.
Transects – a slice of life
By taking a walk through a neighbourhood, or potential settlement area, a group of people can record what they see, talk to people along the way and make notes, look at natural features and identify hazards. Taking pictures and later discussing what was taken and why it is considered important can generate useful debate.
Modelling – bringing ideas to life
Ideas can be brought to life through building models – using simple local materials or scale drawings can all enhance a process involving people in defining their built environment. The same techniques can be used to show what neighbourhoods, community spaces or individual dwellings might look like.
Seasonal calendars – what a difference a year makes
People’s daily reality and livelihood options can change significantly with the seasons. Hazards change in periods of rain or drought, women and men’s workloads may vary enormously and their economic situation accordingly. Plotting out a seasonal calendar with older and younger people, women and men will help to understand the seasonally dependent hazards and opportunities.
Figure 5: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia 4
Social and institutional network analysis – who’s who?
All communities rely on social networks and institutions to govern, organise, and access resources and services. Careful mapping of organisations, for example by placing cut out circles of varying sizes and colours in relation to each other, can h ighlight which formal and informal organisations relate most to, or which ones are disconnected from, communities. It is possible to identify who has responsibility for and controls what. Pivotal relationships and gatekeepers can be identified and implicat ions for any interventions explored.
Livelihoods & class analysis – how do you make a living ?
Diagrams and discussions can help to understand individuals’ and households’ sources of livelihoods, behaviour, decision making and coping strategies. Interventi ons can be focused to strengthen and /or diversify the existing livelihood options and mitigate apparent risks.
Gendered resource mapping – what’s the difference?
By exploring resource availability and use by women and men an appreciation of who controls what and how each benefits can be gained, and a profile can be established.
Problem tree – getting to the root of it
This process aims to create an understanding of prominent problems impacting on individuals and communities. Collective discussion aims to dig deeper in order to understand the root causes and then develop strategies to address these rather than simply tackling symptoms. The branches of the tree reach for the light to nourish future growth.
Ranking and scoring – putting things in place
Hazards, needs or planned actions, services, or any aspect of development can be placed in a matrix and people can be asked to rank each according to the other s. By asking people to share out finite numbers of counters (beans, stones or any other local object available in quantity) a quantitative ranking can be created. It remains true that the discussion and qualitative debate is more interesting than any absolute numbers coming out of the exercise.
Disability mapping – whose needs are special?
A census of disabled people and their disabilities within the community, their location, their livelihood options and the facilities which are available to assist them need to be mapped, so that they can be included in community based activities and their futur e aspirations realised.
Figure 6: Photo credit: Practical Action South Asia
Let us know which of the options below best describes you and we'll direct you to the most relevant content.
Practical Action uses technology to challenge poverty, working with poor women and men around the world.
Explore our work by Country
Explore our work by Technology
+44 (0)1926 634400 email@example.com
© Practical Action