Copenhagen failure

7-18 December 2009, Copenhagen

Rather than starting a new decade full of hope, developing countries have been failed by the outcome of the United Nations climate change talks in Copenhagen.

In the run up to the summit, hopes were high for a fair and just deal for those most vulnerable to climate change, yet no legally binding deal was agreed.

At the last minute a 'deal' was agreed by world leaders, but the 'Copenhagen Accord' leaves much to be desired. The main points include:

  • No emission reduction targets for industrialised counties
  • No plan for how to implement adaptation support for developing counties
  • No timeframe for resolving these issues

It is felt the Copenhagen COP has put talks back by two years, leaving developing countries not further forward than they were following the Bali talks in 2007, where it was decided 2009 would be the final deadline for a post Kyoto successor.

And while NGOs and key members of country delegations were effectively locked out of the talks or forced to queue for hours, celebrity and rock stars seemingly had easy access to the conference. This meant experts were unable to scrutinise text coming out of the conference and raise important questions regarding the detail.

This year's indecision and lack of leadership means millions of people across the world will continue to suffer as climate injustice adversely affects the lives of those who have done little to contribute to the problem.

Latest news from Copenhagen via
    Video: live coverage from Copenhagen via OneClimate.net

    Why we needed a fair deal at Copenhagen

    Veena Khaleque, director of Practical Action Bangladesh, and Daniel Rodríquez (Programme Director, Practical Action Latin America), explain why the developing world needed a fair, ambitious and effective deal that will end climate injustice and avert the worst impacts of climate change.

    Human chain - 11 December 2009

    There is a fear that the voices of indigenous groups are not being heard. The seemingly never ending chain is a protest to highlight that groups such as the Amazonian peoples have no rights within the negotiations and that their perspectives are not being listened to by industrialised nations:

    no comments