Climate change | Blogs

  • The Inequality of coping with floods

    Carlotta Weibl
    October 16th, 2014

    After days of torrential rains in central Europe in 2013, a huge surge of water came down the Elbe and flooded big parts of north-western Germany. The flood killed 89 people in Germany, Russia, Austria, and the Czech Republic and left a damage of more than 12 billion Euros only in Germany. With a water-level of 12,89 metre is was the highest flood in Germany since 500 years.

    Clearly this flood meant hardship for many families in Germany, but I also associate this flood with good-humoured people working together in the sun, while enjoying a cold beer and fresh fruits.

    How that is related? Well, the whole emergency aid was impressively well organised and especially, through social networks like Facebook, many young people came to the dykes to help.

    As many others, my mom and me decided to render ourselves useful on a nice Sunday, so we grabbed our shovels and drove to a dyke, of which I knew from Facebook that there was help still needed.

    Arriving at the dyke, people laughed about our old, dented shovels and we got new ones from the German Army. Since it was a very hot day, caps from the Army, watermelon and water were handed out to the working people. Furthermore the army distributed proper meals and getting a cold beer was obviously no problem as well. I mean we are talking about Germany here.

    Packing sand bagsWhile actually having a great day helping people, I had to think about the circumstances under which people in countries like Bangladesh or India have to cope with floods. These people are often cut off of civilization for days before any help reaches them, while in Germany people are packing sand bags as an afternoon activity during their holidays. We enjoyed cold drinks during the working breaks while people in development countries often have to fear for their lives while drinking, due to polluted water, especially during floods.

    Do not get me wrong, I really enjoyed the atmosphere while working with all these motivated people. I was moved by individuals telling me how far they drove, just because they heard that this particular dyke is at higher risk to break. And I was impressed by the German efficiency and organizational skills, which are often content of a joke in other countries.

    Nevertheless Germany is just one example of a developed country coping with floods. It is indisputable that here tragic stories are happening, about families losing their houses, family members or friends during flooding. But so do people in development countries and they do not have the opportunities and the money to handle floods like we do.

    It is certain that floods will occur more often in the future, due to climate change, and it is proven that the western countries are most responsible for the increasing climate change. It is time for us to think about those who suffer the most from what we are creating by polluting the environment. The world’s poorest people are often hit hardest by natural disasters and they obviously have least capacities to recover from it.

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • Is climate change threatening floating gardens in Bangladesh?

    S M Alauddin
    October 16th, 2014

    Climate Change (CC) is considered the greatest threat to mankind in the 21st century.  Its impacts are evident across the world. It’s a global process and the poor countries of Asia and Africa are the most vulnerable. This is a huge global injustice as these countries have contributed so little to the greenhouse gas emissions that are causing our planet to heat up. Though it’s a global problem, it has particularly devastating local impacts in Bangladesh on agriculture and food production; water, ecosystems and health; extreme events and disaster preparedness; sea level rise and salinity intrusion. Mitigation and adaptation are the major means to addressing risks and vulnerabilities. But, poor countries like Bangladesh, who emit much less carbon, concentrate on adaptation measures, rather than mitigation.

    A floating garden to grow crops when land is flooded

    A floating garden to grow crops when land is flooded

    Hydroponic gardens consist of plants grown without soil. Because rapid climate change is having such adverse negative impacts on agriculture and fishery ecosystems i.e. coastal, floodplain and drought regions, various adaptation options are practiced in Bangladesh. Of those, floating bed vegetable gardening has been a major potential and effective adaptation option in the floodplains and waterlogged areas of Bangladesh over the last two decades. Hundreds of farmers depend on floating gardens for their livelihoods on floodplains where there are very limited agricultural options (one paddy per year).

    Floating bed vegetable cultivation, or hydroponic vegetable gardening is a five hundred year old practice in the low-lying flood prone districts of Bangladesh, particularly, in the south-central and southern areas,  Gopalganj, Madaripur, Pirojpur and Jhalokathi Districts.

    The floating bed crop cultivation is known as ‘gato’, ‘baira’ and ‘dhap chash’ in the areas, where, earlier plants of different vegetables were mainly produced in the rainy season and after the recession of flood water, farmers would use the waste as compost. Over the last two decades, floating garden techniques have been improved a lot. Farmers produce mainly the leafy green plants like pumpkin, water gourd, turmeric, ginger, chichinga, lalshak, puishak, ladies fingers, karalla, arum, tomato, turturi, etc. The production of vegetables from these floating bed is very high, more than double that of normal land. The Department of Agriculture Extension (DAE) has been expanding its cultivation in the haor basin, where there is no salinity but huge scope for floating bed vegetable gardening.

    Water hyacinth is the main material used to prepare the floating bed. However, floating bed cultivation has been threatened due to salinity in Gopalganj District, particularly, in Tungipara Sub-district according to local farmers, as the increased salinity of the water is hampering the growth of water hyacinth. The impact is similar in other areas. Farmers are not getting enough water hyacinth for floating bed preparation. A number of farmers informed me that currently their floating beds have been reduced by at least 30-35% for each farmer than the past years. What will happen to these farmers if floating bed gardening becomes impossible? Climate scientists, researchers and the DAE need to think about this.

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • The value of going back: livelihoods in the catchments of the ‘mad river’

    Eight years ago, when we proposed the Strengthening Livelihood Capacities to DRR in Nepal project (2007-2010), the communities knew their local environment was changing, but climate change was only a debated theory.

    Kirtipur is a village situated on ancient colluvial or landslide deposits in the upper reaches of the Deusat stream – further downstream in the Terai it’s known as the ‘Baulaha’ or ‘mad’ river. For those living in Kirtipur, extreme flooding during the rainy season, together with droughts before and after, have been indicators of something going wrong in their environment.

    One of the communities downstream is Bote, whose residents used to rely on traditional fishing and boat ferrying for their livelihood. Fishing and ferrying is no longer an option for the landless community on the riverbank – the river where they used to ferry and fish is now part of a protected area, and new bridges mean boats are no longer needed to cross the river.

    Those families now depend on off-farm labour – either in the nearby towns along the national highway, Narayanghat, or as migrant workers elsewhere. Those that remain, mostly women, rely on risky agricultural activities in the river margins. Floods were common and often destroyed their low-lying crops. The project supported and organised funds from different agencies for building an embankment to protect the land. The community have been able to reclaim their land – but would the ‘Mad River’ let it stay?

    Tapping ecological opportunities to reduce disaster risks

    To improve the chance of controlling the river, longer term solutions needed to be found, but these would be in the upper reaches of the watershed where slash and burn agriculture was changing the landscape.

    To cut a long story short, the issues of mitigating floods and securing food and protecting the environment were discussed with communities all along the watershed. In the hill village of Kirtipur, opportunities to improve agriculture through irrigation were identified. A small dam and modest piping enabled the community to produce food close to home and agree to rehabilitate the hillsides and stop the slash-and-burn agriculture practice. Through the irrigation alone, over 80 families have benefited, growing one more cereal crop and vegetables in winter, and being able to plant and transplant summer crops in time without depending on the rainfall, which has now become more erratic. Groups were formed, including women’s groups to improve vegetable production, and a savings co-operative was born.

    Institutionalisation of good practices for long-term adaptation

    Since the end of the project in 2010, the community has moved onwards and upwards. The former slash-and-burn areas have become community-managed forests and the proceeds from aging or dead trees have been used to build a school and a road which has enabled better access to markets, secondary schools and health services. The new school has enabled them to upgrade their primary school to also include lower secondary. The availability of potable water close to the village has reduced the women’s workload by over three hours a day.

    During the 8th CBA conference, a group of international participants had the privilege of visiting these communities and seeing how a few simple investments – a potable water supply, a simple gravity irrigation system, community organizations, vegetable growing skills, community managed forest has enabled the community to innovate and transform village life, and continue to develop and adapt to climate change. This project was not designed as a community-based adaptation project, but it provides a very good example of how building capacity and empowering disadvantaged groups enables long term adaptation. As one women from the community said to the CBA8 delegates: “We had to get up at 3 in the morning, now we can sleep until 6.” “We might have needed to migrate out otherwise,” added Min Bahadur Soti, a community leader.

    It is the capacity-building activities that empowered the community, gave them confidence and the ability to continue to innovate. The women now have assets and the confidence to manage their own affairs. They have elected leaders and speak up, where before they were silent. The co-operative manager, a chairperson of the community forest and other village leaders now connect with the district authorities and other service providers. The very fact that three years has passed and the co-operative continues to grow, and permanent forest crops are being established on the former slash and burn areas, is evidence that the watershed is being protected. Livelihood projects continue to be born: a testament to the approach, organise build capacity and empower communities and adaptation will follow.

    The journey has to continue

    The community plans to keep up the good practices they have adopted for climate resilience. They would like to implement a forest management plan, extend the irrigation channel further, and improve agricultural practices to keep up with the changing climate, and some of these initiatives will need financial investment and technical assistance.

    The Glacier Trust is funding us for two years to support community-led schemes that will help them become resilient to climate change. These include increasing the gravity flow of irrigation channels, making better use of available water for crop production, restoring vegetation to the hill slopes, promoting agro-forestry, and mitigating the risk of forest fires through better forest management.

    The community have agreed to invest in each initiative and will also organise resources locally. The project fund will support materials and skills that are not available locally, and our local partner NGO – SAHAMATI have shown commitment to make this happen.

    Dinanath Bhandari and Chris Henderson

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • UN Climate Change Summit – Lets talk about results?

    Margaret Gardner
    September 26th, 2014

    The UN climate change summit is over. Lots of press coverage but did anything happen?

    • Well, I loved the people power – hundreds of thousands of people marching in New York and around the globe. The UN Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon, marched with them.
    • People turned up – world leaders, actors and business people. Okay so maybe this shouldn’t be seen as a great result – but actually sometimes the right people – decision makers – don’t make it to even vital conferences.
    • President Obama said climate change is “the most important and consequential issue of the 21st Century”.
    • Economists and business people talked about the cost of delaying action on climate change and called for urgent action now.
    • There was truth – with Graça Machel (Nelson Mandela’s widow) cutting through the high blown rhetoric and some self-congratulation in the final moments of the conference saying There is a huge mismatch between the magnitude of the challenge and the response we heard here today”.

    There is a mismatch.

    I may be naïve but I find myself believing all of these people – I believe Ban Ki Moon, business leaders, President Obama and the millions of people who took part or who cheered on the climate change marchers. I believe they want to take urgent action. I also believe Graça Machel and find myself asking what’s stopping us from making a substantial response.

    The money required is huge – but the cost on inaction is greater. The money also exists. For example in 2012 as a world we spent $1.8 trillion on weapons, that’s roughly $249 for each person in the world and 2.5% of GDP. By contrast one of the most commonly used estimates of the cost of tackling climate change puts it at 1% of annual GDP. So if we as a world find the money for weapons why can’t we find the money to protect our planet? It seems to me the money’s there – it’s about choices.

    But what’s stopping action on the scale needed happening? Why do even world leaders feel powerless? I am genuinely not sure, although I worry we have systems in place that maintain the status quo and discourage change – all put there for good reasons but now working against the urgent change required.

    Kenyan women march against climate change

    Kenyan women march against climate change

    I feel passionately about climate change because I’ve seen the impacts of the already changing weather patterns and the increasingly erratic weather on the people Practical Action works with – if you are poor and few resources you are most at risk. Not exactly a surprise!

    I came across this quote from Benjamin Morrell: “Morale is when your hands and feet keep on working when your head says it can’t be done.” It seems to me with climate change it’s operating in reverse.

    Maybe we need each and every one of us – from Ban Ki Moon and President Obama – to me and you to start to take action now so that it becomes a habit. Then when it gets to the difficult times our hands and feel will keep going on tackling climate change, even if our heads start to say it can’t be done.



    5 Comments » | Add your comment
  • Community flood resilience in Peru

    Linda Costabile
    Piura, Peru,
    September 26th, 2014

    I have joined Practical Action in Peru for a six-week secondment as part of the Zurich Global Flood Resilience Program, which joins the company I work for, Zurich Insurance, with Practical Action in a common mission to strengthen the resilience of communities to assess, manage, and recover from the impacts of flooding. Just over a week into my secondment, I had the opportunity to visit Piura, a town in the north of Peru particularly at risk for flooding. While there, I joined colleagues for a regional forum on El Niño and climate change as well as a visit to the river basin and surrounding communities. This experience was both eye-opening and thought-provoking for me.

    The forum was a full day of presentations to over 200 local and regional government officials, civil servants, NGO representatives, hydro-meteorological scientists, educators, and others. Through the research I am doing here, I am seeing that the common themes of a shared vision, collaboration, accountability, and engagement among flood resilience stakeholders are critical to success. It was encouraging to see the forum presenters and attendees come together resonating those same themes and voicing their commitment to building flood resilience in the region.

    The day after the forum, I joined a small group for a visit to the river basin outside of Piura. Nearby, we stopped at the home and studio of Santodio, a local ceramics artisan. He led our group through his space consisting of dirt floors, a tin roof, a wood fire surrounded by bricks that he uses as his kiln, and several shelves of beautiful handmade ceramics of all shapes and sizes while explaining how he decorates his beautiful ceramics with white paint and a black resin derived from mango leaves. Santodio is no stranger to flood risk – a few short years ago, the area where he lives and works was completely flooded due to El Niño.

    MairaLater that day, we also met 22-year-old Maira, who has seven siblings and two children of her own. She invited us into the family’s three-room home and small yard where they raise three pigs, two turkeys, and several hens for income. They lack so many things, like access to running water and basic sanitation, but are glad for what they have and the programs that assist them.

    The intense flooding that comes with El Niño can be devastating to people like Santodio and Maira. The riverbed is completely dry now, but the amount of rain that will come in a few months can exceed the river’s capacity twice over. The river then risks overflowing into town and the surrounding more informal settlements, carrying trash, construction materials, and people’s belongings with it.

    In my short time here, I can already see the incredible impact that Practical Action´s work has in managing flood risk and am grateful to both Practical Action and Zurich for this opportunity to contribute to these efforts to build resilience.

    Read more about the Zurich Global Flood Resilience Program

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • Flooding in Sudan – part 1

    Yassir Abdelmutalab
    September 10th, 2014

    This morning, 9th September 2014, some droplets fell from the sky announcing the end of a heavy storm that showered Khartoum the whole of last night (20 mm). I drove from home to the office, taking my little child to his kindergarten, a few meters from the gate, the car got mired down in  heavy mud, I struggled to pull it out, for almost 10 minutes, using all the stunts and tricks, move forward, backward, while steering and turning in all directions; tossing on my seat to lift some weight or put some of it, my wife, please go to the back seat, the child enjoyed the experience; the windshield completely covered with the mud sheets, the wipers and wiping water finished; at last we succeeded to escape away from this place. A poor infrastructure, in addition to lack of knowledge on what to expect and what will happen in the future (forecasting); and I say this because two days ago I heard in the radio, meteorology announcing light rains, opposite to the reality. My other two kids waiting for their school bus, the driver phoned us, informing us that the school principal told him there is no school today due to the heavy rains (we accustomed to that).

    As in previous years,  in Sudan in 2014 we have witnessed a lot of rains and floods, so I thought to shed some light on the topic and discuss flood disasters in Sudan and see how we can deal with them.

    There are many different types of floods; the most important ones are classified into:

    • Regional Flood: normally occur on a seasonal basis when rain water overfill river basins and flood the banks. They also occur during periods of excessive rain when the rain saturates the soil and the runoff overflows streams and rivers.
    • Flash flood: A flash flood is a rapid flooding of geomorphic low-lying areas – washes, rivers and streams. Caused by the heavy rainfall associated with a thunderstorm, hurricane, or tropical storm, etc.
    • Land Slide- Debris Flood: A type of a movement of rocks, regolith, soil and debris mixed with water, similar to some extent to an avalanche.
    • Dam and Levee Failure Flood: The huge release of impounded waters due to structure failure or uncontrolled breach failure.

    Flooding in KhartoumIn recent times Sudan has experienced a series of these disasters, though the flood disaster in Sudan ironically comes in the second place after drought.  We either have too much water or no water!

    The natural conditions together with the geographical location positioned the Sudan in a corner, where its people are vulnerable and have low resilient capacity towards facing disasters and its consequences.

    Floods vary in their magnitude and the worst effects happened in 1946, 1988, 2007, and 2013.  This year 2014  has still not yet unfolded.

    The 1988 Flood of Sudan is considered a reference point, to the extent that today, the staff of the meteorology if they wanted to produce a forecast model (i.e. based on previous years data) they exclude the readings of 1988.  This reminded me of when Mr. Al Gore in his Global warming presentation mounted on the ladder as the line-graph is beyond the screen boundaries.

    It is worth mentioning that, the total annual average of rainfall in Khartoum area is 162mm.

    Over a couple of days in 1988 – more exactly the 4th- 5th August 1988, there was an exceptionally intense storm covered Khartoum, the capital of Sudan. The cloud responsible for that heavy torrent, was measured at almost 500 km till east Sudan, 200km north to Atbara river, resulted in the 80km cross Khartoum. The rainfall commenced at GMT 20:18. In the first hour, the rain gauge read 50mm; toward the end of that night and early morning, exactly at GMT 06:00, the reading reached 210mm. Two more storms took place on  12th and 14th which took the August reading to 301.4mm. It is worth mentioning that in previous years, August rainfall gauges readings were around 12mm.

    The total annual rainfall in 1988 reached 785.5mm. This was a new record compared to the 1946 flood which was 223.9mm.

    With that huge amount of water, Khartoum was inundated. The immediate result of that flood was 1.5 million homeless in Khartoum; houses were damaged and destroyed. Other parts of the country went through a similar experience, and the effects were massive all over the country.

    To some extent, or usually, every year we have floods, but they are minor, except for those took place in 2007, 2013, 2014.

    In 2014 the rainy season is now at its end and rains are above average.  Accordingly a state of emergency was declared in Khartoum, schools were closed till the floodwater recedes and now we are living with the impact.

    SUDAN-WEATHER-FLOODThe measuring tool this year is not how many mm of rains reached, but how many people died, injured, were displaced and suffered? Where are they now? How do they live? When are they getting a permanent shelter? A lot of questions need answers.

    I am quite sure, the readers are well aware about the miserable situations and conditions that affected people live in and most of us, directly or indirectly witnessed these disasters; such as recent floods in Kashmir, Srinagar (India & Pakistan) where over 175 persons lost their lives not to mention the other damage.

    But the question that always emanating is: Why do people always go through this pain? We are living in the 21st century, indeed and by now we ought and must have a lot of  technologies under our disposal, we have a large amount of wealth of knowledge, advanced science, research, huge man-power, tools, equipment, capacity to plan, to implement and to provide solutions. I am looking for convenient small scale solutions to a single family or a neighbourhood, or a village, and then scaling up, a solution that expects what is coming and get prepared against disaster to achieve a minimum loss or damage.

    In spite of the many frequent trials of governments, INGOs, UN bodies to manage floods disasters in Sudan, still the vast majority of people suffered, entrapped in a viscous circle. One example is that some of our people live and build their homes and buildings right in the middle of a seasonal rain stream, why? Why do people do that?

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • Resilience v efficiency: a systems thinking heavyweight bout

    September 3rd, 2014

    Sometimes, Practical Action can really get absorbed in systems thinking. We’ve been working in this space since about 2003, and some of its principles have served as the foundation of some great successes we have had. For an oversimplified approach, think of a terrarium. You have soil, plants water and air all living inside a closed pot (it isn’t considered a true closed system, because sunlight gets in, but you get the idea). If you were to adjust different segments of the system, you might see different developments: more water might mean more growth, or more growth might also mean the system burns out.

    So what happens when this system shifts, and you start looking at populations? Plants become people, soil becomes the economy, maybe even water stays the same, and you consider the impacts of clean water in a community. That evaluation is a key part of how Practical Action often engages with communities. Two key features of systems are resilience, which often shows up in our climate adaption work, and efficiency, which is often considered key to creating transformative impact in the lives of the poor—because if something isn’t efficient, it will probably not be as replicable, and you lose that whole transformative impact component.

    Is a treadle pump resilient, or efficient?

    Is a treadle pump resilient, or efficient?

    These two systems characteristics are inversely related: resilience is a trade-off for efficiency.

    What does that mean? When we talk about resilience in relation to the extreme poor, we are often talking about those who are able to bounce back when they face a system shock. That could be a drought, a flood, or an economic collapse. If you think about it, resilience gets built up by being able to quickly adapt to a change in a system, and that often means there are multiple support systems created that can create the flexibility needed for that change. In the case of drought, that might mean there are several different kinds of crops that are raised, some that work better in wet seasons and some that work better in dry seasons. This could also mean there exists a knowledge base that allows for more resilience as well—you become a generalist as opposed to a specialist so you can perform multiple tasks.

    Then there is efficiency. However you achieve it, be it economies of scale, or through specialization, efficiency is important, because it means you are completing a task more effectively. If you can increase efficiency, you will be able to replicate that task. So when people talk about creating transformative change in a community, efficiency is often necessary for that change to take root. Think of a treadle pump. The first time someone built one, it probably didn’t work very well, but over thousands of years, the design has been improved upon, to the point where many look very similar: they are cheap to build, easy to replicate, and in a word, efficient, given their circumstances.

    These days, efficiency is a major focus in many drives to end poverty. You have limited resources, and efficiency allows for expansion that maximizes those resources. But it also means that you are developing systems that require many of your “resources” (READ: people) to specialize in a given approach. As a result, you aren’t as flexible, and your trade-off is resilience. Think of GMO super crops—they are efficient, because they can be made to resist certain pesticides, and can grow bountifully. But they aren’t resilient, because once an infestation comes along that is particularly brutal to that crop, there is no other crop there to create resilience—food prices go up, and people go hungry.

    So does this mean that the world should be extremely resilient? Or should we focus our efforts wholeheartedly on efficiency, hoping to create economies of scale that are extremely good at overcoming system shocks? Ultimately, this conversation starts sounding more like one with a personal finance advisor. If you are preparing for the future, you need a diversified portfolio. Like in that terrarium, finding the appropriate balance is key, and it will rarely be wholly efficient or wholly resilient.

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • Sheep rearing – a livelihood option in salinity affected coastal areas

    S M Alauddin
    August 30th, 2014

    Bangladesh is extremely vulnerable to climate change. Because of increased salinity, the absence of agricultural practices (other than shrimp culture), a lack of grazing land and acute fodder problems cattle resources have been reduced seriously in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. However, there is much scope of rearing small domestic animals like sheep, goats and pigeons there instead of big animals (cows, buffalo etc.). Further, the area lacks sufficient employment opportunities since shrimp cultivation in gher is the major and dominant livelihoods option in the coastal area. But, most poor and marginal people don’t own land for shrimp cultivation.

    sheepSalinity, being the major dominant feature, crops and vegetables, other than saline tolerant variety, don’t grow in this area. However, people are not well aware of saline tolerant crops and vegetable varieties. So, sheep rearing, considering the salinity and climatic variability context has been considered to be an important adaptive livelihood option in the area, although, there is lack of grazing land and fodder. Sheep is highly salinity and temperature tolerant.

    The rearing of sheep has been increasing gradually in coastal areas as a household based adaptation and alternative income option. A 5´x 8´ house is required for 5/6 sheep. Sama a local grass is the major feed for sheep and this grass grows well in saline soil.  Cultivation of this grass is often done on land adjacent to the homestead.

    Monsoon is the best season for producing this grass since there is sufficient rain and no need for irrigation. Besides sama grass, kura (waste from rice husking), different other grasses whatever available in the locality and leaves from trees are also fed to the sheep. Sheep eat almost everything.

    Sheep require regular vaccination and de-worming to avoid diseases and unexpected death. A sheep of 5/6 months can be sold for Tk.1500-2000. Besides this the income from sheep-dung can’t be understated. Sheep-dung is used as saar (compost) for vegetable production and as fuel. One can get fuel of Tk.450/monthly from 5/6 sheep for cooking.

    This clearly shows that sheep rearing is an important adaptive livelihood option in the increased salinity context for poor, marginal and small farmers. Sheep rearing can contribute to employment creation and eradication of poverty of the poor and marginal, specially, as household based income generation option, where, employment scope is a major problem.

    4 Comments » | Add your comment
  • Dyke cropping: the successful case of Md. Zillur Rahman

    S M Alauddin
    August 28th, 2014

    Cultivation of crops is almost absent in the South Western coastal region of Bangladesh, where shrimp farming has been dominant since the mid-eighties. Salinity intrusion into agricultural land is increasing because of sea level rise due to climate change. Thus the practice of agriculture has been almost stopped in the coastal areas except for shrimp farming.

    The introduction of cropping on the dyke of shrimp gher has been an important innovation by Practical Action, although it was practiced a while back. However, dyke cropping was neither very common, nor systematic. Practical Action, Bangladesh, under its Climate Change Programme in the South Western Coastal District Satkhira demonstrated some livelihoods technologies including Dyke Cropping following an improved method.

    Mr. Zillur Rahman (35) of Kalikapur village, a small holder demonstrated vegetable cultivation on the dyke of his shrimp farm. He had prior experiences of dyke cropping. In October-December 2011, he did ‘dyke cropping’ with Practical Action’s technical support on 4 dykes of different lengths (25-30 to 130 feet). The dyke’s width was 3 feet and height above the flood water level.

    dyke cultivationRahman cultivated vegetables on the dykes in winter (October-December 2011) and during the monsoon (May-September 2012). The vegetables he grew included pumpkin, water gourd, chalkumra, cumcumber and carrala in the winter season and pumpkin, water gourd, chalkumra, cumcumber, carrala along with jhinge, chichinga, dhundal, papaw, ladies fingers, brinjal and puishak in the monsoon. Monsoon cropping required no irrigation as there was sufficient rain, while, drip irrigation technology was used for winter cropping in the pits made on dykes. The size of pit differed for each vegetable (50x50x50 to 80x80x80 centimeter). Both organic and inorganic fertilizer in appropriate doses was used in the pits for vegetable cultivation. The dyke cropping helps to maximise land use, promoting food security and reducing dependency on shrimp farming.

    Technological differences were significant between the earlier and later project. Better dyke design was introduced with adequate height and width than earlier. In the improved system, organic fertilizer use was predominant, however, in-organic fertilizer use was also used  in appropriate doses; machan on dyke prepared with branches of trees earlier, but, bamboo/wooden pole and net were used in the improved system. The cost of machan more than doubled and survived 4 years instead of 1 year for the conventional one.  

    Rahman harvested a total of 182kgs of vegetables in winter and sold at an average market price Tk.15/kg. He harvested a good amount of vegetables (181 Kgs.) by mid-September 2012 and sold at a market price of Tk.16/kg in the monsoon. He expected further 111kgs (approx) up to December 2012 and could sell thse at Tk.15/kg.

    In the improved system, he harvested 2.5 times more compared to earlier practice. The dyke cropping could suitably be expanded and replicated, where vegetable production is almost absent or very poor due to salinity increase, which, could benefit the shrimp farmers by bringing extra income along with household consumption.

    No Comments » | Add your comment
  • The only boss that I have – “The DONOR”

    July 30th, 2014

    Is your boss not satisfied with our work? What do you expect then? A pink slip? – It makes sense and is perfectly logical!  After all, you are hired to meet the expectations of the organisation.  However, as a fundraising professional, I have realised that– at the end of the day, there is the only one boss – “The DONOR”!.

    I recently participated in a week-long certificate course in fundraising and communications in New Delhi, India. I have always been keen on tapping funds from institutions, trusts, foundations and corporate houses. I was quite determined that my efforts/interactions/discussions during the training will mainly be in this line.

    Donor representatives visiting a project in Bangladesh

    Donor representatives visiting a project in Bangladesh

    On the very first day, the resource person somehow tried to give us an impression – “fundraising is all about individuals”. I had a reservation, and I was rather convinced that funding has to do a lot more than an individual. As the days passed, we discussed differently on direct mails, cold calls, donor acquisition and retention, and so on.  At times, I felt that it was a complete waste of time; the whole discussion each day ended with a conclusion – “It is actually about an individual”.

    During a practical session on telefacing, a pretty lady was on the phone talking to a stranger. She talked for about four minutes including her introduction, the cause for the call and the conclusion. I had an impression that the person on the other side gave her an appointment for the meeting. She put down the phone with a cheerful smile on her face. At the end, it is the impression you leave on a stranger. I thought about it over the night and was convinced that fundraising is not possible in isolation. First, it was a cold call that ended up with an appointment, which could turn into a request for a concept note and subsequently a full proposal. No matter how big or small the amount we are proposing, this is exactly the way it works. So, is it all about an individual?

    I wrote a case for support, a capacity statement, appeals and many more. I featured Practical Action’s energy and DRR works, because then I could showcase my project to be the most urgent of all. The question was again, why the projects should be considered urgent to receive funding? I remember many projects I have been involved in which were not as urgent as the others, but they were funded. The answer is – the case I proposed was actually URGENT for somebody at the donor organisation. I again took my stand, it is not about “Somebody” who decides; It is about the whole organisation! But remember, evaluation committee in each donor organisation is comprised of a group of individuals. We need to win their heart, soul and mind! It is them who make decision on whether or not to support our project – be it a 2000 worth activity or a multi-million multifaceted project. So, am I convinced that it is all about an individual?  Somehow, yes!

    Each evening, I analysed what I am doing, and what is my job. I assure quality of donor reports, communicate with them, accompany them to the project sites and make sure they are HAPPY! I swallow all the guidelines on donor call for proposals, and make sure that our proposals meet their needs and criteria. I follow my donors on Twitter, regularly check their sites and update myself on recent happenings. I greet them on their special days, I participate in events/functions mainly because I could talk to them. Every second, I am trying to be nice with them, become conscious on what I communicate, and gently/visibly/widely acknowledge them in every possible activity. What for? Because, I want them to be happy with my organisation and its works. And always, a donor is an individual – to impress whom, we put all our efforts. Having realised all these, what do you think? I strongly believe – “Fundraising is all about an individual”, and a donor in whatever form, ultimately is an individual!

    I don’t want to get fired and become unwanted;  each moment I have this strong desire to please  my boss;  Yes, the only boss that I have – “The DONOR”!

    4 Comments » | Add your comment